I learned about writing from Project Runway is
5) Listen to your Tim Gunns.
People who regularly read my blog have heard this before from me, but it bears repeating.
Tim Gunn is the Chief Creative Officer for Liz Claiborne. He also acts as a mentor for the designers on Project Runway. He hands explains the challenges, accompanies the group to Mood Fabrics to buy supplies and advises them during the creative process.
Anyone who watches the show is familiar with Gunn's trademark stance of arms crossed, hand next to mouth followed by "I'm concerned." Smart designers know to take a good look at what they are doing. Especially if he is more specific. "Do you think that's a little matronly?" was a frequent question last year. The contestants asked that the most went home fairly early.
Sometimes it's a minor adjustment. Others it takes starting over. Not everyone listens to Mr. Gunn's suggestions. The last strategy has worked on rare occasions. Usually, the critiques of the judges echo what the mentor already said.
Do you listen to the Tim Gunn's in your life? When your critique group makes suggestions, do you really listen? Are you lucky enough to have a mentor who has "made it" in some capacity in the business? A friend who is a published author? An agent? An editor?
I'm slowly learning how to take the advice my Tim Gunns give and "make it work"* for me.
*The parting advice Tim Gunn usually gives as he leaves the workroom.
Between my friends bugging me about this and the advice given at a recent writers' conference, it appears I need a blog.
Showing posts with label Project Runway. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Project Runway. Show all posts
Monday, January 10, 2011
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
What I Learned About Writing From
Project Runway
I know. I know. It's not even about writing. It's a reality show about fashion design. I warned you in the first post that I'd be taking inspiration from lots of different places.
The big thing is that it's about creating something. Creating something that will help you achieve your dream. I think that fits.
1) Work to your strengths
Every week the contestants are given different challenges--make a prom dress to a sixteen-year-old's specifications, design an outfit using only items you can find at a hardware store, dress a drag queen or design the best resort outfit you can. No matter how far out the challenge, the outcome is supposed to be a garment that could be sent down a fashion runway.
The designers who do well are those who know their strengths and weaknesses, and work to their strengths. Especially on the wackier challenges.
We all want to do it all well. But let's face it, we all have something that stands out about our writing. Why not play that up? Yes, I work on strengthening my plotting, but I don't forget about character building and dialogue.
2) But that doesn't mean you can't stretch
"I don't do menswear." Or gowns, or resort wear, or whatever. That doesn't cut it on the runway. When you're given a challenge, you either perform or go home.
As writers, we're lucky. We can write whatever we want. No one is standing over us demanding, "Write a steampunk romance set in the old West." At least, not once we get out of school. But it certainly doesn't hurt to stretch ourselves a bit.
Can I add a little more humor to your stories? More romance, mystery? I've tried using a setting that I have to research, that I'm not familiar with. I've found that I enjoy it.
3) Don't repeat yourself
Too often, good designers get stuck. The judges all loved the dress with the intricately folded fabric detail. Then the next week the designer sends out a jacket with folded fabric, then slacks, etc. It gets old fast.
We've all seen it happen with books. Series can be especially susceptible. I know I revisit certain themes, but I really try to beware of characters and situations becoming cookie cutter.
4) You are responsible for your own work
As with most reality shows, there is a confessional type camera that films each individual talking behind the scenes. Gloating, backstabbing or whining.
Last season, one of the contestants complained to the camera. "How do I get the judges to appreciate my brilliant designs?"
Can you find the problem in that question? She put all the responsibility on the judges. What she should have asked was, "How can I improve my designs so I can impress the judges?".
It's hard to accept criticism. To hear that maybe we're lacking. Much easier to blame the critic. They just don't get it. I'm trying very hard to listen to critics, really listen and determine how I can take that criticism and improve.
I know. I know. It's not even about writing. It's a reality show about fashion design. I warned you in the first post that I'd be taking inspiration from lots of different places.
The big thing is that it's about creating something. Creating something that will help you achieve your dream. I think that fits.
1) Work to your strengths
Every week the contestants are given different challenges--make a prom dress to a sixteen-year-old's specifications, design an outfit using only items you can find at a hardware store, dress a drag queen or design the best resort outfit you can. No matter how far out the challenge, the outcome is supposed to be a garment that could be sent down a fashion runway.
The designers who do well are those who know their strengths and weaknesses, and work to their strengths. Especially on the wackier challenges.
We all want to do it all well. But let's face it, we all have something that stands out about our writing. Why not play that up? Yes, I work on strengthening my plotting, but I don't forget about character building and dialogue.
2) But that doesn't mean you can't stretch
"I don't do menswear." Or gowns, or resort wear, or whatever. That doesn't cut it on the runway. When you're given a challenge, you either perform or go home.
As writers, we're lucky. We can write whatever we want. No one is standing over us demanding, "Write a steampunk romance set in the old West." At least, not once we get out of school. But it certainly doesn't hurt to stretch ourselves a bit.
Can I add a little more humor to your stories? More romance, mystery? I've tried using a setting that I have to research, that I'm not familiar with. I've found that I enjoy it.
3) Don't repeat yourself
Too often, good designers get stuck. The judges all loved the dress with the intricately folded fabric detail. Then the next week the designer sends out a jacket with folded fabric, then slacks, etc. It gets old fast.
We've all seen it happen with books. Series can be especially susceptible. I know I revisit certain themes, but I really try to beware of characters and situations becoming cookie cutter.
4) You are responsible for your own work
As with most reality shows, there is a confessional type camera that films each individual talking behind the scenes. Gloating, backstabbing or whining.
Last season, one of the contestants complained to the camera. "How do I get the judges to appreciate my brilliant designs?"
Can you find the problem in that question? She put all the responsibility on the judges. What she should have asked was, "How can I improve my designs so I can impress the judges?".
It's hard to accept criticism. To hear that maybe we're lacking. Much easier to blame the critic. They just don't get it. I'm trying very hard to listen to critics, really listen and determine how I can take that criticism and improve.
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Courtney brought up a good point in her response to my Project Runway post. [And, no, Jenny, I wasn't talking about you.] She talked about how some of the contestants freak out when asked to step out of their comfort zone. Same thing happens on Top Chef. Courtney's argument was that chefs, designers and writers need to be able to step outside their boxes once in a while.
Folks, that's why you see prompts and challenges on this and other blogs from the Pirates. That's why UGWP does round stories. That's why we have played a card game where you pick the cards that you will build the story on. Not because we think that one day Jenny will figure out how to market a Top Chef kind of show involving wrters (although that would be groovy), but because we all get those stray ideas that don't fit into our usual genres. Or maybe we realize that one of our story ideas would work better as a screen or stage play than a novel. Or we really, really want to enter that short story contest with the big prize payout. If those muscles are already warmed up, it's easier to engage them when the time comes.
There's another aspect to what Courtney said. That the contestants are freaked out by the twists the shows throw at them. On more than one occasion, I've said, "Don't they watch this show?" Because they always have twists, often the same ones from season to season.
Which comes back to research. I know I've talked about it before, but it bears repeating. DO the research. Want to submit to the Super Groovy Magazine Contest? First, read the guidelines. Second, look at a recent issue. If they only publish hyper-literary stories between 3,000-5,000 words, don't submit a 7,000 word fantasy piece. Same goes with agents.
Two reality shows about seemingly unrelated jobs that are both, apparently, unrelated to writing. But I've been able to adapt lessons from both into my writing. Are there other shows that have given you insight into your craft? Movies? Music? Something else?
Folks, that's why you see prompts and challenges on this and other blogs from the Pirates. That's why UGWP does round stories. That's why we have played a card game where you pick the cards that you will build the story on. Not because we think that one day Jenny will figure out how to market a Top Chef kind of show involving wrters (although that would be groovy), but because we all get those stray ideas that don't fit into our usual genres. Or maybe we realize that one of our story ideas would work better as a screen or stage play than a novel. Or we really, really want to enter that short story contest with the big prize payout. If those muscles are already warmed up, it's easier to engage them when the time comes.
There's another aspect to what Courtney said. That the contestants are freaked out by the twists the shows throw at them. On more than one occasion, I've said, "Don't they watch this show?" Because they always have twists, often the same ones from season to season.
Which comes back to research. I know I've talked about it before, but it bears repeating. DO the research. Want to submit to the Super Groovy Magazine Contest? First, read the guidelines. Second, look at a recent issue. If they only publish hyper-literary stories between 3,000-5,000 words, don't submit a 7,000 word fantasy piece. Same goes with agents.
Two reality shows about seemingly unrelated jobs that are both, apparently, unrelated to writing. But I've been able to adapt lessons from both into my writing. Are there other shows that have given you insight into your craft? Movies? Music? Something else?
Labels:
Courtney,
Jenny,
marathon. pirates,
Project Runway,
research,
Top Chef,
UGWP
Friday, August 28, 2009
The Same Amount Of Time
Project Runway is back. As is a new season of Top Chef. And watching them, I realized something. It takes just as long to make an ugly dress or an awful meal as it does a winner.
I think we, as writers, tend to dismiss bad writing as something that was just "dashed off." No real effort went into it. But that's not the case. Not always. Think about workshops or critique groups you've been in. There seems to be that one person. You know the one. Intense. Focused on their story, or character. They've been working on this manuscript for years. Honing. Reworking. And it's bad. It's really bad. Oh, there may be some redeeming value. He writes good dialogue. Or she can give you a wonderful love scene. But the characters are flat and the situations are trite. There's no music in the writing. You'd rather stick hot pokers in your eyes than read another submission from these people.
But they work at it. They spend a lot of time on their stories. So it's not laziness. I don't think it's lack of talent, whatever that is. So what is it?
Attitude. That "I know better than everyone else" attitude. The unwillingness to even listen to a different opinion. When you've got a Tim Gunn in the room, people, listen up. Because if you listen, he's not telling you to sell out or be just like everyone else. He's saying to step back and really look at what you're doing.
There have been so many people on these shows who are eliminated in early rounds, because they refuse to listen. Their attitude is that everyone else is stupid. If everyone else was just smarter or cooler or more refined, then this person would win the whole shebang. And when they leave, the parting words are usually along the lines of, "At least I didn't compromise my vision." Okay. If that's what is important to you, than go for it. But realize that people wear clothes that make them look good. We eat food that tastes good. And we read books about complex characters in interesting situations.
I think we, as writers, tend to dismiss bad writing as something that was just "dashed off." No real effort went into it. But that's not the case. Not always. Think about workshops or critique groups you've been in. There seems to be that one person. You know the one. Intense. Focused on their story, or character. They've been working on this manuscript for years. Honing. Reworking. And it's bad. It's really bad. Oh, there may be some redeeming value. He writes good dialogue. Or she can give you a wonderful love scene. But the characters are flat and the situations are trite. There's no music in the writing. You'd rather stick hot pokers in your eyes than read another submission from these people.
But they work at it. They spend a lot of time on their stories. So it's not laziness. I don't think it's lack of talent, whatever that is. So what is it?
Attitude. That "I know better than everyone else" attitude. The unwillingness to even listen to a different opinion. When you've got a Tim Gunn in the room, people, listen up. Because if you listen, he's not telling you to sell out or be just like everyone else. He's saying to step back and really look at what you're doing.
There have been so many people on these shows who are eliminated in early rounds, because they refuse to listen. Their attitude is that everyone else is stupid. If everyone else was just smarter or cooler or more refined, then this person would win the whole shebang. And when they leave, the parting words are usually along the lines of, "At least I didn't compromise my vision." Okay. If that's what is important to you, than go for it. But realize that people wear clothes that make them look good. We eat food that tastes good. And we read books about complex characters in interesting situations.
Now, I'm not saying that a writer should take every suggestion that comes his or her way. No more than a chef or a designer should. That would be crazy. But have a good reason for why you're doing something in a particular way. Be able to defend it with something more than, "because I want to do it that way."
So, if you're going to spend the time anyway, why not write a good book? And listen to your Tim Gunns.
Labels:
Because I had to say it,
Project Runway,
Tim Gunn,
Top Chef
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)